{"id":253558,"date":"2024-10-16T14:56:38","date_gmt":"2024-10-16T21:56:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/mastering-manybots-your-guide-to-creating-powerful-telegram-bots-without-coding\/"},"modified":"2026-04-12T15:04:49","modified_gmt":"2026-04-12T22:04:49","slug":"%d8%a5%d8%aa%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86-manybots-%d8%af%d9%84%d9%8a%d9%84%d9%83-%d9%84%d8%a5%d9%86%d8%b4%d8%a7%d8%a1-%d8%a8%d9%88%d8%aa%d8%a7%d8%aa-telegram-%d9%82%d9%88%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d8%a8%d8%af%d9%88%d9%86","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/mastering-manybots-your-guide-to-creating-powerful-telegram-bots-without-coding\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0625\u062a\u0642\u0627\u0646 Manybots: \u062f\u0644\u064a\u0644\u0643 \u0644\u0625\u0646\u0634\u0627\u0621 \u0631\u0648\u0628\u0648\u062a\u0627\u062a Telegram \u0642\u0648\u064a\u0629 \u062f\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c\u0629 \u0625\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0645\u062c\u0629"},"content":{"rendered":"<input type=\"hidden\" value=\"\" data-essbisPostContainer=\"\" data-essbisPostUrl=\"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/mastering-manybots-your-guide-to-creating-powerful-telegram-bots-without-coding\/\" data-essbisPostTitle=\"Mastering Manybots: Your Guide to Creating Powerful Telegram Bots Without Coding\" data-essbisHoverContainer=\"\"><p>Manybots is one of those keywords that survives long after the software behind it stops feeling new. The platform people usually mean is <strong>Manybot<\/strong>, the older no-code Telegram bot builder that runs inside Telegram and still shows up in search because it made bot creation much easier for non-developers. The practical question in 2026 is not whether Manybot was useful a few years ago. It is whether it is still the smartest way to build a Telegram bot today.<\/p>\n<p>As of <strong>April 12, 2026<\/strong>, Manybot is still reachable. The <a href=\"https:\/\/manybot.io\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">official Manybot site<\/a> still says more than <strong>100,000 bots<\/strong> are managed through its platform and that those bots send more than <strong>15 million messages a day<\/strong>. Telegram&#8217;s own <a href=\"https:\/\/telegram.me\/Manybot\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">launch page for @Manybot<\/a> also showed <strong>963,535 monthly users<\/strong> when I checked it for this refresh. So this is not a ghost keyword pointing to a dead domain. There is still a real product trail here.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, the age signals are hard to ignore. Manybot&#8217;s homepage footer still shows <strong>2015<\/strong>. Its <a href=\"https:\/\/manybot.io\/privacy.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">privacy policy<\/a> says it was last updated on <strong>May 23, 2018<\/strong>. Its <a href=\"https:\/\/manybot.io\/tos.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">terms of service<\/a> say the website is operated by <strong>ManyChat, INC<\/strong>. That combination does not automatically make Manybot unusable, but it does change how you should evaluate it. The real risk in 2026 is not that Manybot is some fake scam page. The real risk is betting a serious business workflow on a tool that still looks more like a legacy utility than an actively polished product.<\/p>\n<p>That is why this refresh is going to be blunt. If you need a simple Telegram menu bot, a lightweight broadcast bot, or a fast way to experiment without writing code, Manybot can still be worth testing. If you need modern AI behavior, clearer compliance signals, current documentation, better reporting, or strong cross-channel marketing automation, you should treat Manybot as the baseline, not the finish line. And if your customers already live in Facebook or Instagram DMs, not Telegram, compare that reality against <a href=\"\/pricing\/\">Check Current Pricing<\/a> before you spend a week building on the wrong channel.<\/p>\n<h2>What Manybot Still Does Well and Where It Feels Dated in 2026<\/h2>\n<p>Manybot became popular for one simple reason: it removed the hardest part of Telegram bot creation for non-developers. You still need Telegram&#8217;s official bot setup layer, which means creating a bot through <a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/bots\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BotFather and the Telegram Bot Platform<\/a>. But after that, Manybot lets you handle the everyday build work inside a guided interface. You can start the bot in Telegram, connect your new bot, define commands, create multilevel menus, add admins, and send broadcast-style updates without touching code.<\/p>\n<p>That matters more than it sounds. A lot of Telegram bot guides quietly assume that everyone is comfortable with tokens, webhooks, JSON, hosted code, and API limits. Most small businesses, creators, community managers, and newsletter operators are not trying to become Telegram developers. They want a bot that can answer basic questions, deliver updates, route people to the right link, and maybe autopost content from an RSS feed or YouTube channel. Manybot still speaks directly to that use case.<\/p>\n<p>The easiest way to understand Manybot in April 2026 is to separate its <strong>current utility<\/strong> from its <strong>current maturity signals<\/strong>. Utility is about what the tool can still help you do. Maturity is about whether you would trust it as the center of a business-critical automation stack. Those are not the same thing.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>2026 signal<\/th>\n<th>What the source shows<\/th>\n<th>What it means for you<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Homepage positioning<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/manybot.io\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Manybot.io<\/a> still promotes no-code Telegram bot creation.<\/td>\n<td>The product is still publicly accessible and still marketed for Telegram bots.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Usage claim<\/td>\n<td>The homepage says more than 100,000 bots send over 15 million messages a day.<\/td>\n<td>Manybot is not an empty brand shell, but those numbers are self-reported and not timestamped.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Telegram activity signal<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/telegram.me\/Manybot\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telegram&#8217;s launch page for @Manybot<\/a> showed 963,535 monthly users on April 12, 2026.<\/td>\n<td>People are still finding and launching the bot inside Telegram.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Feature set<\/td>\n<td>The site still highlights custom commands, menus, multi-admin control, RSS autoposting, and six display languages.<\/td>\n<td>Manybot is still strongest for simple structured bots, not for newer AI-heavy bot behavior.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Freshness signal<\/td>\n<td>The footer still shows 2015.<\/td>\n<td>The public-facing web layer has not been modernized much.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Policy freshness<\/td>\n<td>The privacy policy says last updated May 23, 2018.<\/td>\n<td>Legal and governance signals are dated compared with modern SaaS expectations.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ownership clue<\/td>\n<td>The terms page says the website is operated by ManyChat, INC.<\/td>\n<td>There is a visible relationship to ManyChat, but the product positioning is still not explained clearly on the homepage.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Pricing clarity<\/td>\n<td>The main site does not present a normal public pricing grid.<\/td>\n<td>If transparent billing matters, Manybot feels much less predictable than newer platforms.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Is Manybot legit and still alive?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, Manybot still looks <strong>legit<\/strong> in the narrow sense that matters most to searchers asking this question. The official site is live. The Telegram launch page is live. The bot can still be launched inside Telegram. The service is not pretending to be something it is not, and it is not operating like the usual fake &#8220;earning bot&#8221; clones that disappear behind suspicious logins, recycled screenshots, or impossible payout promises.<\/p>\n<p>But &#8220;legit&#8221; is not the same as &#8220;best current option.&#8221; Manybot reads like a <strong>legacy but working<\/strong> Telegram builder. That puts it in a very specific category. You can still use it. You just should not assume it keeps pace with Telegram&#8217;s newest bot features, business workflows, or AI-oriented capabilities. That difference matters a lot in 2026 because Telegram itself is moving faster again.<\/p>\n<p>If your goal is a lightweight community bot, a channel update bot, or a structured FAQ bot that mostly runs on menus and prewritten replies, Manybot can still make sense. If your goal is AI support, serious lead routing, multichannel attribution, or anything you plan to sell to clients at scale, the dated surface area becomes a real business issue. Old tools can still work well. They just need a smaller job.<\/p>\n<h3>How to access Manybot now, and what the login path actually looks like<\/h3>\n<p>Manybot is not a normal dashboard-first SaaS where you create an account in a browser and then build everything from a web app. The practical access path still starts inside Telegram. Manybot&#8217;s own homepage tells users to open Telegram, search for &#8220;Manybot,&#8221; or use the direct Telegram link. The cleanest direct URL is <code>https:\/\/telegram.me\/Manybot<\/code>, which resolves to the official launch page for <code>@Manybot<\/code>.<\/p>\n<p>The real setup path usually looks like this:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Create the bot identity with <a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/bots\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BotFather<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Save the token somewhere secure.<\/li>\n<li>Open <code>@Manybot<\/code> in Telegram through <a href=\"https:\/\/telegram.me\/Manybot\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">telegram.me\/Manybot<\/a> or by searching inside the app.<\/li>\n<li>Press <strong>Start<\/strong> and follow the instructions to connect your bot.<\/li>\n<li>Build the first command set, menu structure, and welcome flow.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>That distinction matters because many articles about manybots casually blur together BotFather, Manybot, and Telegram itself as if they are one product. They are not. BotFather is Telegram&#8217;s official creation layer. Manybot is an extra management layer on top.<\/p>\n<h3>What Manybot costs, and why payment clarity is part of the decision<\/h3>\n<p>Manybot&#8217;s public web presence still does <strong>not<\/strong> give you the kind of pricing clarity most buyers expect in 2026. The homepage does not show a plan grid. The legal pages reference payment processing, but they do not present a simple current breakdown of starter, pro, or enterprise plans. They also do not clearly advertise support for payment methods such as PayPal or region-specific options.<\/p>\n<p>That creates friction for two groups. The first is business users who need predictable software spend before they launch. The second is international users who want to know whether checkout is straightforward. If you are comparing manybots with a modern SaaS option, pricing transparency is not some minor detail. It is one of the strongest signals that the product is either actively maintained for buyers or mostly left to keep running on existing momentum.<\/p>\n<p>This is also one of the places where older blog posts feel misleading. They often discuss Manybot as if it belongs in the same commercial category as newer platforms with live pricing pages, billing calculators, and support SLAs. It does not. If money predictability matters, Manybot is the more uncertain bet.<\/p>\n<h2>Why Telegram Bots Still Matter for Communities, Support, and Sales<\/h2>\n<p>Manybot only makes sense if Telegram itself still matters. In 2026, it absolutely does. Telegram&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/telegram.org\/faq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">official FAQ<\/a> says the app now has <strong>over 1 billion active users<\/strong>, supports groups of up to <strong>200,000 people<\/strong>, and lets channels broadcast to <strong>unlimited audiences<\/strong>. Telegram&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/bots\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">official bot introduction<\/a> also says the platform hosts more than <strong>10 million bots<\/strong>. That is real platform scale, not a niche toy ecosystem.<\/p>\n<p>Those numbers matter because they tell you what kind of product decision you are making. A Telegram bot is not just a weird side project for power users anymore. It can be a real support surface, a paid content delivery tool, a lead capture flow, a community assistant, a booking helper, or a premium subscription gateway. The app is big enough that a serious Telegram-native audience is worth serving if your market is actually there.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the part many generic roundups still get wrong: Telegram bots are strongest when the bot lives inside a workflow people already repeat. A trading-alert channel, a creator membership, a support group, a sports-alert bot, a digital-download bot, or a lead-qualification flow for a Telegram-first community can work very well. A local business whose customers only ever respond to Facebook ads and Instagram comments may be forcing Telegram into a job it does not need to do.<\/p>\n<h3>Telegram&#8217;s newer bot features changed the ceiling for serious builds<\/h3>\n<p>Telegram&#8217;s bot platform is more capable now than many old Manybot articles suggest. The official bot introduction says Telegram bots can host Mini Apps, receive payments, integrate AI chatbots, and turn on <strong>Business Mode<\/strong> in BotFather when they support integration with Telegram Business accounts. Telegram also says bots now support <strong>threaded conversations<\/strong> for handling several topics in parallel and can <strong>stream live responses<\/strong> as they are generated. That is a much more modern starting point than the old &#8220;commands and menus only&#8221; mental model.<\/p>\n<p>Telegram&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/bots\/api%20%20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bot API changelog<\/a> shows <strong>Bot API 9.6<\/strong> released on <strong>April 3, 2026<\/strong>, adding managed-bot tools. Earlier 2026 updates added private-chat topics, business-bot support, and more bot-level control in BotFather. If you are using a no-code builder that does not clearly expose these newer capabilities, you are eventually working below Telegram&#8217;s actual ceiling.<\/p>\n<p>Telegram&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/api\/business\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">business documentation<\/a> is also explicit about what connected business bots are supposed to do now. Business users can connect Telegram bots that process and answer messages on their behalf, which Telegram says allows businesses to integrate existing workflows or add AI assistants that manage chats. That is a very different posture from the early era when Telegram bots often felt like side-channel utilities rather than business infrastructure.<\/p>\n<h3>The rate limits still matter, especially if you plan to broadcast<\/h3>\n<p>Telegram gives you scale, but it does not remove delivery constraints. The official <a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/bots\/faq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bots FAQ<\/a> says bots should avoid sending more than <strong>one message per second<\/strong> in a single chat, cannot send more than <strong>20 messages per minute<\/strong> in a group, and are limited to about <strong>30 messages per second<\/strong> for bulk notifications by default. For many small bots, that is fine. For alert systems, large communities, and high-volume publishers, it changes architecture decisions immediately.<\/p>\n<p>The same FAQ says paid broadcasts can raise throughput to <strong>1000 messages per second<\/strong>, but that comes with real gating: Telegram says each message above the free threshold costs <strong>0.1 Stars<\/strong>, and the feature requires at least <strong>100,000 Stars on the bot balance<\/strong> and at least <strong>100,000 monthly active users<\/strong>. That is exactly the kind of detail older Manybot posts miss. Telegram still has a generous platform layer, but serious scale is no longer the same thing as &#8220;free forever.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The practical takeaway is simple. Telegram is still a strong place to build if your users are already there. It is even better now for business bots, AI chat, and productized utilities. But you should choose your builder with today&#8217;s Telegram in mind, not with a 2018 feature map in your head.<\/p>\n<p>If you want a broader map of current no-code and code-heavy paths before you commit, our guide to <a href=\"\/telegram-bot-builder-from-free-no%E2%80%91code-tools-to-python-ai-github-and-pro-solutions-for-shops-games-and-discord\/\">Telegram bot builders<\/a> is the better companion read after this section.<\/p>\n<h2>How to Pick the Right Telegram Bot for a Group, Channel, or Private Inbox<\/h2>\n<p>The best Telegram bot is not &#8220;the one with the most features.&#8221; It is the one that matches the actual job. This is where a lot of Manybot content goes off track. People search for manybots because they want a shortcut to the right build path, but what they really need is a decision framework.<\/p>\n<p>Start with the message environment. Telegram gives you three very different operating surfaces: private chats, groups, and channels. A bot that works well in one does not automatically fit the others. A private support bot needs clean onboarding and clear branching. A group bot needs moderation discipline and permission awareness. A channel companion bot needs reliable content delivery, opt-in flow, and maybe a premium branch.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Use case<\/th>\n<th>Best bot style<\/th>\n<th>When Manybot fits<\/th>\n<th>When to pick something else<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Simple FAQ or menu bot<\/td>\n<td>Command and button driven<\/td>\n<td>Strong fit if the flow is structured and low risk.<\/td>\n<td>Use a newer builder if you need advanced analytics, AI, or CRM syncing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Channel updates and content blasts<\/td>\n<td>Broadcast plus autoposting<\/td>\n<td>Still reasonable if RSS and scheduled-style updates are enough.<\/td>\n<td>Use custom tooling if volume, segmentation, or monetization is complex.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Group moderation and admin support<\/td>\n<td>Permission-aware utility bot<\/td>\n<td>Only partly. Manybot is not the strongest choice if moderation is the main job.<\/td>\n<td>Use purpose-built moderation tooling or a custom bot.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Lead capture and support handoff<\/td>\n<td>Structured qualification flow<\/td>\n<td>Possible for a lightweight version.<\/td>\n<td>Use a modern platform if leads need tagging, routing, or reporting.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Paid memberships or gated content<\/td>\n<td>Subscription and access-control bot<\/td>\n<td>Weak for serious commercial operations.<\/td>\n<td>Use tooling that clearly supports payments, subscriptions, and lifecycle management.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AI assistant or knowledge bot<\/td>\n<td>Threaded, context-aware assistant<\/td>\n<td>Usually not the best path.<\/td>\n<td>Use a newer Telegram stack that can expose current AI and business features.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Pick the bot by outcome, not by keyword nostalgia<\/h3>\n<p>If your goal is to help members find resources, join the right channel, request a quote, or open a support branch, Manybot can still be enough because those flows are mostly deterministic. Users tap a button, choose a menu, or trigger a command, and the bot responds with a known next step. That is the core thing no-code Telegram tools have always done well.<\/p>\n<p>If your goal is to run a business support inbox, qualify prospects, log structured contact data, trigger follow-up campaigns, and sync everything into the rest of your stack, Manybot starts feeling thin. That is not a criticism of what it was built to do. It is just a mismatch of ambition and tool depth. The more your bot starts touching revenue, compliance, or handoff quality, the more important reporting, integrations, auditability, and predictable support become.<\/p>\n<p>A good way to pressure-test the decision is to ask this: <strong>if the bot breaks for a day, what really gets hurt?<\/strong> If the answer is &#8220;people miss a nice update,&#8221; Manybot may be perfectly fine. If the answer is &#8220;support leads disappear, buyers stall, or customers get the wrong answer,&#8221; then you should hold Manybot to a higher standard than a legacy convenience layer can always meet.<\/p>\n<h3>A short checklist for choosing the right Telegram bot build<\/h3>\n<p>Use this checklist before you choose Manybot, ManyChat, or a custom path:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The bot has one primary job, not five vague ones.<\/li>\n<li>You know whether the bot lives in private chat, a group, a channel, or all three.<\/li>\n<li>You know whether replies are menu-based, keyword-based, or AI-based.<\/li>\n<li>You know what user data, if any, the bot must capture and where it should go.<\/li>\n<li>You know whether the bot needs broadcast volume beyond basic limits.<\/li>\n<li>You know whether a human needs to take over some conversations.<\/li>\n<li>You know whether Telegram is really the main audience channel.<\/li>\n<li>You know what success looks like in numbers: subscribers, click-throughs, answered questions, bookings, or sales.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you cannot answer those eight points, the problem is not that you need a more advanced builder. The problem is that the workflow is still too vague.<\/p>\n<h3>Do not force Telegram on a Meta-first audience<\/h3>\n<p>This is the mistake I see most often with business chatbot projects. The owner likes Telegram, the keyword has traffic, and the bot sounds easy to launch, so the team builds there first. Then they remember that most actual customers still reply to Facebook ads, DM on Instagram, or use website chat. That is a channel-fit problem, not a bot-feature problem.<\/p>\n<p>If your users really are Telegram-native, fine, build there. If the leads actually begin on Meta, Telegram may still play a role, but it should not automatically be the front door. A lot of businesses would get faster results by keeping Telegram as a niche or premium layer and using a Messenger-first stack for the public customer journey. That is exactly the point where <a href=\"\/messenger-bot-pro\/\">MessengerBot Pro Features<\/a> become more relevant than squeezing another workaround out of a Telegram-only tool.<\/p>\n<h2>How to Create a Telegram Bot Without Coding Using Manybot, BotFather, and Modern Builders<\/h2>\n<p>Creating a Telegram bot without coding is still very realistic in 2026. The main change is that you have more choices now, which makes the setup path both easier and easier to mess up. The cleanest approach is to separate the job into three layers: the <strong>official bot identity<\/strong>, the <strong>no-code control layer<\/strong>, and the <strong>growth or integration layer<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The official identity layer is always Telegram. That means BotFather. The no-code control layer can be Manybot or another builder. The growth or integration layer is where people decide whether they need RSS feeds, Google Sheets, AI, CRM actions, multi-channel routing, or paid access flows. If you skip that middle thinking step and just rush into a builder, the bot often launches fast but ages badly.<\/p>\n<h3>The practical no-code setup path that still works<\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li>Open Telegram and start <a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/BotFather\">@BotFather<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Use <code>\/newbot<\/code> to create the bot and choose a stable username.<\/li>\n<li>Store the API token securely the moment BotFather gives it to you.<\/li>\n<li>Decide whether your first version really needs Manybot or just BotFather plus a simpler utility stack.<\/li>\n<li>If you choose Manybot, launch <a href=\"https:\/\/telegram.me\/Manybot\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">@Manybot<\/a> and connect the bot.<\/li>\n<li>Build the first command set, menu tree, welcome reply, and one fallback response.<\/li>\n<li>Test the full path on mobile, because Telegram bot friction is often obvious there first.<\/li>\n<li>Only after the base flow works should you add autoposting, broadcasts, premium logic, or cross-platform routing.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>That order is boring, which is why it works. Most failed no-code bots try to start with integrations, not with a clean first-run experience. Users do not care that you connected five tools if the opening chat feels confusing.<\/p>\n<h3>How Manybot fits into that setup<\/h3>\n<p>Manybot still makes sense when you want the build work to happen mostly <strong>inside Telegram<\/strong>. That is the point people forget. It does not just avoid code. It also avoids a lot of the typical dashboard friction that comes with browser-first builders. For a solo creator or a small community manager, that can still be a feature, not a limitation.<\/p>\n<p>Manybot&#8217;s homepage still highlights the features that define its sweet spot:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>custom commands for predictable replies,<\/li>\n<li>multilevel menus for navigation,<\/li>\n<li>multiple admins for shared management,<\/li>\n<li>RSS and YouTube autoposting for content delivery,<\/li>\n<li>language support for standard system messages.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>That list tells you what kind of bot Manybot wants to be. It wants to help you create a structured Telegram utility fast. It does not present itself as a deep AI platform, a modern CDP, or a multichannel revenue engine.<\/p>\n<h3>A simple Manybot launch workflow that still makes sense<\/h3>\n<p>If you are using Manybot today, this is the version I would start with:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Create the bot in BotFather and set the name, username, and profile image.<\/li>\n<li>Open Manybot and connect the bot token.<\/li>\n<li>Create three to five commands only: <code>\/start<\/code>, <code>\/help<\/code>, one content or offer command, one support command, and one settings or info command if needed.<\/li>\n<li>Build one top-level menu with no more than four buttons.<\/li>\n<li>Write a welcome message that tells the user exactly what to do next.<\/li>\n<li>Add one content autopost feed only after the manual flow works.<\/li>\n<li>Run test conversations from a second Telegram account before you promote the bot publicly.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>That may sound small, but it is enough for a first public version. The fastest way to ruin a no-code Telegram bot is to ship a giant maze of menus nobody needs. Manybot is better when you use it as a precise tool, not as a substitute for product thinking.<\/p>\n<h3>Where Manybot starts to feel limiting<\/h3>\n<p>Manybot becomes harder to justify once you need things like advanced analytics, structured customer data sync, full AI assistants, versioned team workflows, or modern commercial transparency. It also feels thin if your growth path depends on more than Telegram. The moment you say, &#8220;we also need Facebook comments to trigger a DM,&#8221; or &#8220;we need this to sync with email and CRM,&#8221; you are moving into a different category of chatbot platform.<\/p>\n<p>There is also a subtler limitation: newer Telegram platform features may arrive faster than older no-code layers expose them. Telegram&#8217;s own docs now emphasize threaded AI conversations, streaming responses, Mini Apps, connected business bots, and managed bots. If a builder does not clearly show how it handles those capabilities, you cannot assume it does.<\/p>\n<p>That does not make Manybot obsolete. It just means the product is easier to recommend for <strong>simple automation<\/strong> than for <strong>Telegram-first product development<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h3>The no-code rule that saves the most time<\/h3>\n<p>Build the first version around one measurable job. For example:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Send one daily update users can opt into.<\/li>\n<li>Answer one category of repeated support question.<\/li>\n<li>Route prospects to the correct sales or booking link.<\/li>\n<li>Gate access to one premium content path.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you try to launch announcements, support, payments, affiliate logic, onboarding, and AI chat all in the first version, you will not prove anything clearly. You will just create a messy bot faster.<\/p>\n<p>If you want broader build patterns after Manybot, our walkthrough on <a href=\"\/how-to-build-a-powerful-no-code-chatbot-a-step-by-step-guide\/\">building a no-code chatbot<\/a> is the right next read because the discipline is the same even when the channel changes.<\/p>\n<h2>When ManyChat Is the Better Choice Than Manybot<\/h2>\n<p>ManyChat and Manybot sound similar enough that searchers often treat them like close substitutes. They are not. Manybot is a Telegram-centered no-code utility builder. ManyChat is a modern marketing automation platform that now positions itself primarily around <strong>Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok, and Messenger<\/strong>. That difference matters more in 2026 than it did when both names were mainly associated with no-code chat automation.<\/p>\n<p>ManyChat&#8217;s own homepage says it is loved by <strong>1M+ creators, marketers, and brands<\/strong>. Its public positioning is not &#8220;build a Telegram helper bot in minutes.&#8221; It is &#8220;turn conversations into leads, sales, and growth&#8221; across large social and messaging channels. If you are comparing manybots with ManyChat, the real choice is usually <strong>Telegram-native utility<\/strong> versus <strong>cross-channel marketing automation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Pricing also tells the story. ManyChat&#8217;s current public <a href=\"https:\/\/manychat.com\/pricing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pricing page<\/a> still shows a <strong>Free<\/strong> plan for up to <strong>1,000 contacts<\/strong>, a <strong>Pro<\/strong> plan starting at <strong>$15\/month<\/strong>, and an <strong>Elite<\/strong> tier with custom pricing. But its <a href=\"https:\/\/help.manychat.com\/hc\/en-us\/articles\/14281409288604-Billing-FAQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Billing FAQ<\/a>, updated <strong>March 12, 2026<\/strong>, says ManyChat introduced a <strong>new pricing model on March 2, 2026<\/strong> and that plan availability now varies by region and account age. That is exactly the kind of nuance you need in a 2026 comparison, because old screenshots can easily be wrong now.<\/p>\n<p>ManyChat also makes its billing mechanics much clearer than Manybot. The Billing FAQ says the legacy-style Pro plan starts at <strong>$15\/month for up to 500 contacts<\/strong>, is billed monthly, and <strong>does not support PayPal<\/strong>. The same help article says billing runs through Stripe, that a free trial gives <strong>14 days<\/strong> of Pro testing, and that pricing scales with contacts rather than staying flat. Whether you like that pricing logic or not, at least you can model it.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Platform<\/th>\n<th>Best fit<\/th>\n<th>Current strength<\/th>\n<th>Main tradeoff<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Manybot<\/td>\n<td>Simple Telegram bots without coding<\/td>\n<td>Fast Telegram-native setup for commands, menus, and autoposting<\/td>\n<td>Legacy signals, unclear pricing, and less obvious access to newer bot capabilities<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>ManyChat<\/td>\n<td>Cross-channel marketing automation<\/td>\n<td>Modern growth tooling, public pricing, integrations, and broad social automation<\/td>\n<td>Contact-based pricing and a platform focus that is not Telegram-first<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BotFather plus custom tooling<\/td>\n<td>Serious Telegram product builds<\/td>\n<td>Direct access to Telegram&#8217;s current bot feature set<\/td>\n<td>More setup work and more technical responsibility<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>MessengerBot<\/td>\n<td>Meta-first business messaging<\/td>\n<td>Better fit for Facebook Messenger and adjacent support or lead flows<\/td>\n<td>Wrong front door if your audience is truly Telegram-first<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Choose ManyChat when channel breadth matters more than Telegram purity<\/h3>\n<p>ManyChat is the better choice if the real workflow lives across social channels and the bot is supposed to capture leads, qualify prospects, answer common questions, or automate follow-up where the audience already spends time. If Instagram comments, Messenger DMs, WhatsApp, and TikTok triggers are central to the funnel, ManyChat fits that job better than Manybot.<\/p>\n<p>Choose Manybot when you specifically want a Telegram-native bot and you do <strong>not<\/strong> need the rest of the marketing stack to live in the same tool. That is the cleaner dividing line.<\/p>\n<p>If your business is mostly Facebook Page messages, Instagram DMs, and website conversations, not Telegram groups, this is also the point where comparing <a href=\"\/pricing\/\">See Our Plans<\/a> with <a href=\"\/messenger-bot-pro\/\">Upgrade to Pro<\/a> makes more sense than trying to turn a Telegram builder into a Meta growth engine.<\/p>\n<h2>How to Connect Telegram Bots With Facebook, Instagram, and Website Funnels<\/h2>\n<p>The smartest use of Manybot in 2026 is often not to treat it as the whole strategy. It is to use it as one layer in a broader messaging funnel. Telegram bots are strong at retention, content delivery, subscriber habits, and utility. Social platforms are strong at discovery. Websites are strong at search and intent capture. The clean builds use each surface for what it already does well.<\/p>\n<p>Manybot&#8217;s own homepage still highlights RSS and YouTube autoposting, which tells you something important: the product has always been good at <strong>delivery<\/strong>. That is useful if you run a creator channel, a market update feed, a software alert bot, or a newsletter companion bot. Your website, Instagram bio, Facebook post, or email CTA can drive the first opt-in. Telegram then becomes the persistent channel people return to.<\/p>\n<p>Here is a practical cross-platform pattern that still works:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Publish the value promise on the public surface where discovery happens first: website, Facebook, Instagram, X, or email.<\/li>\n<li>Use a clean <code>t.me<\/code> bot link or QR code to move interested people into Telegram.<\/li>\n<li>Use the Telegram bot to qualify, segment, or deliver the first useful asset immediately.<\/li>\n<li>Keep the ongoing value inside Telegram only if the audience actually stays active there.<\/li>\n<li>Route high-intent users back to booking, checkout, or support when the bot reaches its limit.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This pattern works because Telegram is excellent at keeping a lightweight relationship alive after the first click. What it usually does not do as well as Meta for many mainstream businesses is create the first conversation at scale. That is why forcing every lead into Telegram can feel elegant in theory and wasteful in practice.<\/p>\n<h3>When Telegram should be the front door<\/h3>\n<p>Use Telegram as the main entry point when the audience is already there on purpose. This usually includes creator memberships, trading or sports alerts, technical communities, paid information products, crypto or web3 audiences, private customer groups, fan communities, and certain international markets where Telegram behaves more like a daily utility than a secondary app.<\/p>\n<p>In those cases, Manybot can still play a useful part because the bot does not need to drag people from a foreign channel into Telegram. They are already comfortable there. Your job is just to make the first interaction structured and useful.<\/p>\n<h3>When Telegram should be the second step, not the first<\/h3>\n<p>If your prospects discover you through Meta ads, Instagram comments, Facebook Page messages, or website forms, Telegram often works better as a second-step environment. Maybe the ad drives to a Messenger flow first, and only premium users or power users get invited into a Telegram bot or channel later. Maybe the website captures the lead, and Telegram becomes the alert layer. Maybe Instagram builds awareness, and Telegram holds the deeper community.<\/p>\n<p>That is also the moment when channel-specific tooling matters. A Telegram builder can still be part of the stack, but it is no longer the whole answer. If your operations already run through Meta inboxes and follow-up automation, compare <a href=\"\/messenger-bot-pro\/\">MessengerBot Pro Features<\/a> instead of pretending Telegram should own the entire customer journey just because manybots still ranks.<\/p>\n<h3>Do not ignore the website layer<\/h3>\n<p>One of the easiest ways to improve Telegram bot performance is to stop dumping raw bot links into random posts and instead build one clear landing page that explains:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>what the bot does,<\/li>\n<li>who it is for,<\/li>\n<li>what users get in the first minute,<\/li>\n<li>why they should trust it,<\/li>\n<li>what happens after they click through.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>That landing page can rank in search, answer objections, and pre-qualify people before they ever open Telegram. Manybot can handle the inside-Telegram workflow. Your website should handle the context that a bot window cannot explain as efficiently.<\/p>\n<h2>Telegram Bot Trends for 2026: AI Threads, Business Bots, and Paid Broadcasts<\/h2>\n<p>The biggest mistake you can make with manybots in 2026 is to evaluate it against the old Telegram bot market instead of the current one. Telegram is no longer just the place where hobby bots, utility commands, and quirky channel helpers live. It now has a clearer business direction again. The official docs emphasize AI assistants, business-account integrations, managed bots, Mini Apps, threaded conversations, streaming responses, and paid scale for broadcasts.<\/p>\n<p>That changes the bar for every builder. If a tool still feels centered on static commands, menus, and autoposting alone, it may still be useful, but it is no longer defining the frontier.<\/p>\n<h3>Threaded AI conversations are changing user expectations<\/h3>\n<p>Telegram now officially promotes threaded conversations for bots so users can manage several topics in parallel, and it supports streamed responses as those replies are generated. That is a meaningful UX shift. Once users get used to bots that can handle multiple discussion threads cleanly, the old flat-command model starts feeling rigid for anything beyond simple utilities.<\/p>\n<p>This does not mean every bot needs AI. It means users are being trained by the platform to expect richer conversation patterns. Manybot can still win on speed and simplicity, but it probably will not be where you want to stay if your product roadmap includes a true assistant experience.<\/p>\n<h3>Business bots are now a real category, not an edge case<\/h3>\n<p>Telegram&#8217;s business docs now describe connected business bots that can process and answer messages on behalf of business users. That is a strong signal. Telegram is clearly making room for bot-driven operations inside business messaging, not just inside public groups and channels. If you run support, sales qualification, or service coordination on Telegram, that matters a lot more than another marketing headline about &#8220;chatbot growth.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It also means you should think harder about governance. Older no-code layers may still be fine for simple community tasks, but once a bot is operating close to business identity and customer messaging, ownership, documentation, token control, legal freshness, and support quality matter much more.<\/p>\n<h3>Paid scale is splitting hobby bots from serious operations<\/h3>\n<p>Telegram still offers a generous free base, but the paid-broadcast rules make the next stage explicit. Small bots can stay lightweight. Big bots now have a documented path to industrial sending speed, but it costs real money and requires real activity. That split is healthy. It also means you should stop evaluating bot platforms with the old assumption that volume is basically free if you stay clever enough.<\/p>\n<p>For many creators and small teams, that will not matter yet. For publishers, high-frequency alert bots, and revenue-backed communities, it absolutely will. Planning for that early is smarter than discovering it only after the subscriber count becomes a problem.<\/p>\n<h3>The practical verdict on Manybot in 2026<\/h3>\n<p>Here is the honest answer after reviewing the current sources: <strong>Manybot is still useful, but it is no longer a future-proof default.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Use Manybot if all of the following are true:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>your bot is Telegram-first,<\/li>\n<li>the workflow is simple and structured,<\/li>\n<li>you want the fastest no-code path,<\/li>\n<li>you can live with dated commercial signals.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Move past Manybot if any of these are true:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>you need AI-heavy conversation flows,<\/li>\n<li>you need clean analytics and integrations,<\/li>\n<li>you need current pricing and billing clarity,<\/li>\n<li>you need business-grade support or client-facing reliability,<\/li>\n<li>your real customer channel is Meta, not Telegram.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The smarter move for many teams is not to ask whether Manybot is dead. It is to ask whether your first useful workflow deserves a legacy tool, a Telegram-native modern build, or a completely different channel stack.<\/p>\n<section>\n<h3>The next move if you are deciding today<\/h3>\n<p>If your audience is genuinely Telegram-native and the workflow is simple, test Manybot fast and keep the first build narrow. If your customer journey mostly starts in Meta inboxes, do not force Telegram to be the answer just because the keyword is familiar. Compare <a href=\"\/pricing\/\">View MessengerBot Pricing<\/a> if you want the fastest look at the current Messenger-first path, then review <a href=\"\/messenger-bot-pro\/\">MessengerBot Pro Features<\/a> if you already know the workflow needs heavier automation, routing, or multi-step follow-up. And if you publish bot setup tutorials, run an agency, or recommend tools to other businesses, <a href=\"\/affiliate-program\/\">Become an Affiliate<\/a> is a cleaner monetization path than sending people into dated software just because it still has name recognition.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<h2>References Checked for This Refresh<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/manybot.io\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Manybot official homepage<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/telegram.me\/Manybot\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telegram launch page for @Manybot<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/manybot.io\/privacy.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Manybot privacy policy<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/manybot.io\/tos.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Manybot terms of service<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/telegram.org\/faq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telegram FAQ<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/bots\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telegram bot platform introduction<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/bots\/faq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telegram Bots FAQ<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/bots\/api%20%20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telegram Bot API recent changes<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/core.telegram.org\/api\/business\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telegram business bot documentation<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/manychat.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ManyChat homepage<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/manychat.com\/pricing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ManyChat pricing<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/help.manychat.com\/hc\/en-us\/articles\/14281409288604-Billing-FAQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ManyChat Billing FAQ<\/a>, checked April 12, 2026.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<section class=\"faq-section\">\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>Is Manybot still working in 2026?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes. As of April 12, 2026, Manybot&#8217;s official site was live and Telegram&#8217;s launch page for <code>@Manybot<\/code> was also live, showing 963,535 monthly users. The better question is not whether it still works at all, but whether it still fits the level of bot you want to build.<\/p>\n<h3>Is Manybot the same thing as BotFather?<\/h3>\n<p>No. BotFather is Telegram&#8217;s official bot-creation tool. Manybot is a separate no-code management layer that sits on top of the Telegram bot you create through BotFather. You normally use BotFather first, then Manybot if you want a no-code setup path.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the best no-code way to create a Telegram bot now?<\/h3>\n<p>The best no-code path depends on the job. For a simple menu bot or broadcast helper, Manybot can still be enough. For a more serious Telegram product, start with BotFather and then choose a builder or custom layer that clearly supports current Telegram features. For Meta-first businesses, a Messenger-focused platform is usually the better path.<\/p>\n<h3>Is Manybot better than ManyChat for Telegram?<\/h3>\n<p>For a pure Telegram-native, lightweight no-code bot, Manybot is often the more direct fit. For multi-channel marketing automation across Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok, and Messenger, ManyChat is the stronger platform. They overlap on &#8220;chatbot&#8221; in a broad sense, but they are solving different problems.<\/p>\n<h3>Should I use Manybot if my customers mostly message on Facebook and Instagram?<\/h3>\n<p>Usually no. If discovery, support, and lead capture mostly happen in Meta channels, Telegram should not automatically be your main bot channel. In that case, compare Telegram against a Messenger-first stack and choose the place where your customers already respond.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<p>  <script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n    \"mainEntity\": [\n      {\n        \"@type\": \"Question\",\n        \"name\": \"Is Manybot still working in 2026?\",\n        \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n          \"text\": \"Yes. As of April 12, 2026, Manybot's official site was live and Telegram's launch page for @Manybot was also live, showing 963,535 monthly users. The better question is not whether it still works at all, but whether it still fits the level of bot you want to build.\"\n        }\n      },\n      {\n        \"@type\": \"Question\",\n        \"name\": \"Is Manybot the same thing as BotFather?\",\n        \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n          \"text\": \"No. BotFather is Telegram's official bot-creation tool. Manybot is a separate no-code management layer that sits on top of the Telegram bot you create through BotFather. You normally use BotFather first, then Manybot if you want a no-code setup path.\"\n        }\n      },\n      {\n        \"@type\": \"Question\",\n        \"name\": \"What is the best no-code way to create a Telegram bot now?\",\n        \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n          \"text\": \"The best no-code path depends on the job. For a simple menu bot or broadcast helper, Manybot can still be enough. For a more serious Telegram product, start with BotFather and then choose a builder or custom layer that clearly supports current Telegram features. For Meta-first businesses, a Messenger-focused platform is usually the better path.\"\n        }\n      },\n      {\n        \"@type\": \"Question\",\n        \"name\": \"Is Manybot better than ManyChat for Telegram?\",\n        \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n          \"text\": \"For a pure Telegram-native, lightweight no-code bot, Manybot is often the more direct fit. For multi-channel marketing automation across Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok, and Messenger, ManyChat is the stronger platform. They overlap on chatbot in a broad sense, but they are solving different problems.\"\n        }\n      },\n      {\n        \"@type\": \"Question\",\n        \"name\": \"Should I use Manybot if my customers mostly message on Facebook and Instagram?\",\n        \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n          \"text\": \"Usually no. If discovery, support, and lead capture mostly happen in Meta channels, Telegram should not automatically be your main bot channel. In that case, compare Telegram against a Messenger-first stack and choose the place where your customers already respond.\"\n        }\n      }\n    ]\n  }\n  <\/script><\/p>\n<span class=\"et_bloom_bottom_trigger\"><\/span>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<input type=\"hidden\" value=\"\" data-essbispostcontainer=\"\" data-essbisposturl=\"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/mastering-manybots-your-guide-to-creating-powerful-telegram-bots-without-coding\/\" data-essbisposttitle=\"Mastering Manybots: Your Guide to Creating Powerful Telegram Bots Without Coding\" data-essbishovercontainer=\"\"><p>Manybots in 2026: current Manybot status, Telegram setup steps, pricing signals, alternatives, and FAQ answers based on fresh sources.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":14928,"featured_media":253559,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":"","rank_math_title":"","rank_math_description":"","rank_math_focus_keyword":"","rank_math_canonical_url":"","rank_math_robots":"","rank_math_facebook_title":"","rank_math_facebook_description":"","rank_math_twitter_title":"","rank_math_twitter_description":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-253558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14928"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253558"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253558\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":262019,"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253558\/revisions\/262019"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/253559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/messengerbot.app\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}