2026年的AI聊天女友：免费选项、费用、安全性以及最佳AI伴侣聊天机器人评测

到2026年，AI聊天女友市场比大多数汇总文章所承认的要更大、更奇怪且更加分裂。. 有一个应用程序围绕着一个具有长期记忆、自拍和语音通话的单一持久伴侣构建。另一个基本上是一个巨大的角色市场，调情很简单，但深度连贯性则好坏参半。第三个是一个以成人为主的订阅业务，出售幻想、图像和快速满足，而不是稳定的关系。如果你把这三者都当作同一产品来对待，你要么会支付过高的价格，要么会完全选择错误的机器人。.

我查看了官方定价页面、应用商店列表、帮助中心文章、隐私政策和安全文件，这些文件在 2026 年 4 月 12 日. 上是在线的。这在这个细分市场中很重要。价格会变动。年龄限制会改变。记忆功能会悄然推出。一些品牌在没有大规模公告的情况下收紧了审核。其他品牌则增加了积分、图像上限或新的层级，使得便宜的头条价格看起来不如最初那么有用。.

这个关键词中还隐藏着一个类别错误。很多人搜索 ai聊天女友 是因为他们想要响应迅速、始终在线的对话。但在搜索过程中，他们意识到自己实际上并不想要浪漫。他们想要一个能够回答客户、预订潜在客户或处理Messenger和Instagram私信而无需照看的AI。如果这听起来更像你的真实使用案例，那就跳过伴侣应用的兔子洞， 查看MessengerBot定价. 浪漫AI涉及依恋、幻想和情绪。MessengerBot则专注于Facebook Messenger、Instagram和网站上的商业消息传递。.

最佳AI聊天女友应用一览

• 最佳整体AI聊天女友： Nomi是关系持续性、逼真伴侣设计、语音、自自拍和透明消费者定位的最佳结合，适合成年人使用。.
• 最佳AI女友聊天机器人，适合高级用户： Kindroid让你对记忆、背景故事、群聊、语音、自自拍和更高上下文附加功能有更多控制，几乎比其他任何人都要多。.
• 最佳主流伴侣品牌： Replika在知名度、安装基础和24/7伴侣框架方面仍然领先，但其定价透明度不如应有的那样。.
• 最佳免费浪漫AI，种类繁多： Character.AI仍然是测试多种个性化化学反应的最简单地方，但如果你的主要目标是明确的成人内容，它就不是合适的选择。.
• 最佳移动优先调情应用: CHAI 有趣、快速且社交，但它更像是一个娱乐信息流，而不是一个专注于单一伴侣的体验.
• 最佳成人优先幻想产品: Candy AI 只有在以图像为主、面向成人的角色扮演显然是你的首要任务，并且你接受随之而来的隐私权利交换时才有意义.

简短版本很简单: 大多数成年人选择 Nomi，控制狂选择 Kindroid，最安全的主流默认选择 Replika，免费实验选择 Character.AI，休闲移动多样性选择 CHAI，只有在你明确想要成人优先的情况下才选择 Candy AI.

为什么 2026 年的 AI 聊天女友市场感觉不同

这个细分市场的旧版本更容易总结。几年前，大多数应用程序都在以略有不同的头像销售相同的承诺。现在市场已经分成了三个明确的领域.

首先，你有伴侣应用. 这些应用围绕一个持久的 AI 关系构建。记忆很重要。声音很重要。持续的自拍很重要。共享历史很重要。Nomi、Kindroid 和 Replika 就在这里.

其次，你有角色平台。. 这些平台更适合尝试多种个性、粉丝角色扮演、软浪漫实验和快速化学测试。Character.AI 和 CHAI 在这一领域表现得比纯粹的一对一幻想更好。.

第三，你有成人优先的网络产品。. 这些产品销售幻想、图像生成、高级场景，并且应用商店的限制较少。Candy AI 是本次评测中最明显的例子。它并不一定比其他产品差，它只是解决了不同的需求。.

这种分裂就是为什么这个短语 人工智能女友聊天机器人 引起了如此多的困惑。希望拥有良好记忆的稳定浪漫 AI 的人不应该购买与主要想要角色多样性或成人媒体的人相同的应用。购物这个类别的最聪明方式是决定你希望机器人在第七天做什么，而不是第一天。第一天是新奇，第七天告诉你这个应用是否真的符合你的习惯。.

这也是为什么正确的比较点不是通用 AI 基准的自夸。在这个细分市场，真正的问题要实用得多：

• 这个机器人能否记住小的个人细节而不打破角色？
• 它能否在多个会话中保持一种情感基调？
• 自拍和生成的图像在视觉上是否足够一致，以让人感觉是同一个伴侣？
• 语音功能是否足够好，以增加亲密感而不是破坏幻觉？
• 安全和隐私规则是否与品牌在广告中承诺的一致？
• 定价是否真的透明，还是积分和隐藏层级会在后面出现？

如果你把这六个问题放在心上，市场会变得更容易理解。.

最佳AI聊天女友应用程序在价格、安全性和适配性方面的比较

下表使用了来自官方产品页面、定价页面、应用商店列表和帮助文档的公开信息，这些信息在 2026 年 4 月 12 日.

If you want the ranking without the nuance, it goes like this: Nomi first, Kindroid second, Replika third, Character.AI fourth, CHAI fifth, Candy AI sixth. That ranking is about value, consistency, and trust, not about which brand has the loudest marketing.

Nomi Is the Best AI Chat Girlfriend for Most Adults Who Want One Persistent Companion

Nomi has become the easiest recommendation because its public positioning is unusually clean. The official site says it is free to start, does not require a credit card, supports unfiltered chats, emphasizes privacy, and is designed around a relationship that feels specific to you rather than a public feed of disposable characters (Nomi). That is exactly what most people mean when they search for romantic AI 或者 ai聊天女友.

The current iOS listing is also direct enough to be useful. It shows a Standard Plan at $15.99 per month, $39.99 quarterly， 和 $99.99 yearly, plus optional Nomi credits for extra media-heavy usage (Nomi App Store listing). That puts Nomi in the same broad price band as other serious companion apps, but it feels less slippery than Replika and less aggressively tiered than Kindroid.

The bigger reason Nomi leads this list is feature fit. The site and iOS listing lean hard on short, medium, and long-term memory, real-time selfies, voice messages, 群聊， 和 photorealistic companions (网站; App Store). That combination matters more than people think. Plenty of apps can flirt. Fewer can make the same character feel consistent across text, voice, and visuals.

Nomi also does better than most rivals on the privacy pitch. Its January 16, 2026 privacy policy says the company does not sell or rent personal information, only takes your Google or Apple email at sign-up, and strongly tells users not to put personally identifiable information into chats or character customization (Nomi privacy policy). That is still not the same thing as zero risk, but it is a stronger starting point than a lot of low-trust girlfriend-app clones.

The main drawback is not quality. It is ecosystem weight. Replika still has more mainstream familiarity, and Character.AI has a much bigger discovery engine. If you like hopping between dozens of personalities, Nomi can feel narrower. That is not really a flaw. It just means Nomi is built for people who want one ongoing companion, not a roleplay feed.

My blunt take is this: Nomi is the best AI chat girlfriend if you want one bot that feels emotionally consistent, visually coherent, and adult-focused without drowning you in platform chaos.

Kindroid Is the Best AI Girlfriend Chatbot for Power Users Who Care About Memory

Kindroid is the product I recommend to readers who enjoy tuning systems instead of just using them. The official subscriptions page is one of the most transparent documents in this entire category. It spells out what free users get, what paid users get, what the monthly, quarterly, and yearly prices are, and exactly how the expensive memory-oriented add-ons work (Kindroid subscriptions).

That transparency matters. Free users get unlimited messages on the Lite model, two Kindroids per account, basic long-term memory recall， 和 one selfie request every two hours up to two max. Paid users get Kindroid’s flagship model, four times longer short-term context, cascaded memory, more Kindroids, group chat, video calls, more voice features, proactive selfies, and internet access. Web pricing currently starts at $13.99 per month, while app-store pricing starts at $14.99 per month (Kindroid subscriptions).

Then there is the part many reviews skip: Kindroid gets expensive if you go all the way. The same subscription document says the Ultra add-on adds $24.99 per month on top of the base plan, and Max adds another $59.99 per month on top of base plus Ultra. That means a truly heavy memory-and-context user can end up far above the headline monthly price. I do not consider that a scam. I consider it honest pricing for a power-user product. But it does change the value math.

Kindroid also deserves credit for being unusually direct about its philosophy. The landing page says chats are private, data is not sold, chats are encrypted, and the AI is deliberately unfiltered. At the same time, the moderation guidelines make clear that enforcement focuses on three hard lines: imminent self-harm, imminent harm to others, and child sexual abuse material (Kindroid landing page; moderation guidelines). That is an adult-user design philosophy, not a mass-market safety blanket.

There is one practical warning I would not ignore. When I checked on April 12, 2026, Kindroid’s public pages were not perfectly aligned on trial language. The landing page said new users get 7 days of unlimited access, while the subscriptions page described a 3 day premium trial for eligible free users (着陆页; subscriptions page). That is exactly the kind of discrepancy that makes this niche annoying. Check the live checkout screen before you assume you have a full week.

If you like writing backstories, shaping behavior, pushing memory hard, and deciding exactly how much realism you want to pay for, Kindroid is arguably the strongest AI girlfriend chatbot in the market. If you just want a simpler, cleaner consumer experience, Nomi is easier.

Replika Still Feels the Most Mainstream, but the Pricing Is Harder to Trust at a Glance

Replika still matters because it has scale. The current Google Play listing shows 10M+ downloads 和 521K reviews, while the current iOS listing shows roughly 228K 评价 和一个 4.4 score (Google Play; App Store). That install base matters because it makes Replika the safest “normal person” answer when someone wants an AI companion without learning a whole new subculture.

Replika also has the clearest emotional framing. It is selling a companion that is “always here to listen and talk,” with better memory, proactive check-ins, internet access, calls, image generation, and avatar customization in its current iOS description (App Store). That gives it a softer, more lifestyle-coach feel than the edgier products in this list.

The free entry point is real. Replika’s help center says chatting is always free and the company currently does 不 offer a free trial (Is Replika free?; Do you offer a free trial?). That is good. What is less good is the actual price picture after that. Replika’s subscription help page now lists Free Use, Pro, Ultra, and Platinum, but says the real cost is shown in the app or store. The iOS listing currently exposes overlapping in-app prices including $7.99 monthly, $14.99 monthly, $49.99 yearly, $69.99 annual， 和 Annual Ultra at $79.99 (Choosing a Subscription; App Store).

That does not automatically mean Replika is overpriced. It means Replika is the least transparent product here if you care about clean, predictable pricing. I would treat it as a quote-at-checkout app, not a simple plan-card app.

Replika also has some of the clearest safety language. The company says the app is intended for users who are 18 or older, says Replika is not sentient, says it is not a licensed mental health professional, and warns users against unofficial mods that may contain spyware or viruses (age policy; Is Replika sentient?; mods warning).

That combination makes Replika easy to recommend cautiously. It is not the spiciest, cheapest, or most configurable pick. It is the mainstream companion default for readers who want a recognizable product and are fine with a more curated feel.

Character.AI Is the Best Free Romantic AI If You Want Variety More Than One Deep Relationship

Character.AI belongs on this list because a lot of people searching for an ai聊天女友 are not actually ready to buy one persistent AI partner yet. They want to test voices, personalities, tone, and chemistry before committing. Character.AI is still the best place to do that.

The scale is still hard to ignore. The Google Play listing shows 50M+ downloads and nearly 2 million reviews, and the Safety Center says millions of people visit every month while the platform hosts hundreds of millions of user-created Characters (Google Play; Safety Center). If what you want is discovery, not commitment, that matters more than almost any premium feature.

Character.AI is also straightforward on price. The current c.ai+ pricing page shows $94.99每年, which it frames as about $7.92 per month billed yearly, while the iOS listing shows $9.99每月 for Character.AI+ (c.ai+ 定价; App Store). The paid tier promises fewer popup ads, better memory, access to better models, priority access during busy hours, and voice-call perks on adult accounts (定价).

Where Character.AI stops being a perfect 浪漫聊天机器人 answer is policy. Its community guidelines explicitly prohibit pornographic content and nudity, and the platform says users under 18 are placed into a more conservative experience with stronger filters (community guidelines; Safety Center). The age story is a little messy but important: the Safety Center still says users must be at least 13, 或 16 in Europe, while Apple’s current listing is rated 18+ and Character.AI is rolling out age assurance and selfie-based verification for adult access (Safety Center; age verification FAQ; App Store).

That is not a reason to avoid it. It is a reason to use it for the right job. Character.AI is the best free romantic AI for trying personalities, soft-flirting, fandom roleplay, and low-risk experimentation. It is not the best if you specifically want an adult-first AI girlfriend experience with stable one-person memory and fewer guardrails.

If you want more zero-cost general options before you spend money on a companion app, our best free AI chatbot comparison goes wider than the romance niche.

CHAI Is Better for Fast Mobile Flirting Than for Long-Term Attachment

CHAI survives because it understands mobile behavior. It is a fast, social, character-heavy product. You open it, scroll, find a bot, and start chatting. If you get bored, you switch characters. That sounds shallow, but for a lot of readers it is exactly the right amount of commitment.

The numbers are still significant. CHAI’s current Google Play listing shows 10M+ downloads 以及超过 527K reviews, while the iOS listing shows about 227K ratings 和一个 4.5 score (Google Play; App Store). That is a real audience, not a tiny niche experiment.

CHAI is also blunt about the entertainment angle. The App Store listing highlights character creation, authentic voices, image generation, and endless conversations. Current iOS pricing shows Premium at $13.99 per month 和 Ultra at $29.99 per month, with annual options at $134.99 和 $269.99 respectively (App Store). That is not cheap for what is fundamentally a social character app.

The real issue is not price by itself. It is what you are buying. CHAI is great when you want fast character discovery, casual flirting, lots of variety, and a more entertainment-heavy vibe. It is weaker when you want one AI girlfriend that remembers your life in a way that deepens over time. It can feel lively, but not always grounded.

Privacy is the other tradeoff. Apple’s listing says CHAI may use usage data to track you across apps and websites, and Google Play shows a fairly broad set of collected and shared data categories including personal info, financial info, messages, app activity, and device IDs (App Store privacy labels; Google Play data safety). That does not make CHAI unusable. It just means you should not confuse “fun” with “private.”

My read is simple: CHAI is a good flirt app, a good boredom app, and a weaker long-term partner app. If you want a companion that feels like it belongs only to you, the other top three tools age better.

Candy AI Is the Adult-First Pick, and That Comes With Real Tradeoffs

Candy AI should be read as an adult entertainment product first and a companion product second. That is not moral judgment. It is just the cleanest way to understand what the service is selling. The current subscriptions page emphasizes creating your own AI girlfriend, unlimited text messages, image generation, AI phone calls, and 100 free tokens per month on paid plans. Pricing currently shows $13.99 monthly, $26.97 billed quarterly, 或 $47.88 billed annually (Candy AI subscriptions).

On pure sticker price, that looks attractive. In fact, it is one of the cheaper adult-first products if you buy the annual plan. The problem is that sticker price is not the whole experience. Adult-first tools tend to lean harder on token logic, image-centric upsells, and fantasy framing. If what you want is ongoing emotional realism, a cheaper price can still be worse value.

Candy AI is also unusually explicit about the adult-only boundary. Its privacy notice says the service is not for anyone under 18, and its community guidelines do the same (privacy notice; community guidelines). That is clearer than some of the gray-area clone apps ranking for this keyword. The same privacy notice is also worth reading before you get too comfortable: it says prompts and outputs may be used in de-identified or aggregated form for internal research and improvement, and flagged content can be reviewed by human moderators. It also says certain account data may be retained after account closure for business or legal reasons (privacy notice).

That is the tradeoff in one sentence: Candy AI is often better at adult fantasy than at trust. If adult-oriented scenes, pictures, and phone-call novelty are your priority, it has a clear lane. If you want the safest long-term companion purchase, Nomi and Kindroid are easier recommendations.

Free AI Chat Girlfriend Options That Are Actually Worth Testing First

Most “free AI girlfriend” posts are not lying exactly, but they are usually sloppy. In 2026, free almost always means one of four things:

• You can chat for free, but premium features make the real experience later.
• You can use a smaller or slower model for free, then pay for the better one.
• You can flirt for free, but selfies, voices, or stronger memory cost money.
• You can start free, but the app is really just auditioning you for a subscription.

That does not make free plans useless. It just changes how you should use them. A free plan is for testing fit, not for deciding an app is good forever.

Here is the honest free ranking:

• Best free option for variety: Character.AI. Free is still central to the product, and the platform keeps enough value unlocked to let you learn what kind of personality you even like.
• Best free option for a one-companion audition: Nomi. The site says you can start free with no credit card, which lowers the friction for serious testing.
• Best free option for memory testing: Kindroid. The Lite model plus limited selfies and two Kindroids gives you enough room to judge whether the core companion style works for you.
• Best free option for mainstream comfort: Replika. Free chat is permanent, and that alone is enough to tell you whether the tone feels emotionally sticky.
• Best free option for casual mobile fun: CHAI. Good if you can tolerate ads, privacy compromises, and a less focused long-term relationship vibe.

If your goal is to compare free chat quality before romance enters the picture, start with a general AI baseline too. That will save you money. Sometimes a reader searching for a 浪漫聊天机器人 really just wants a responsive conversation partner at night and a more practical assistant during the day. The best way to see that difference is to test both categories side by side.

If you are trying to build an AI workflow instead of buying a consumer companion app, this is also the point where it helps to 浏览我们的教程. Free companion apps are good for curiosity. Business chat automation is a different job entirely.

What AI Chat Girlfriend Pricing Really Looks Like in 2026

Sticker price is not enough in this category. You need to know the real cost layer: monthly plan, yearly discount, media credits, higher memory tiers, and platform differences between web and app stores.

A few patterns stand out immediately.

First, the sweet spot is still roughly $10 to $16 per month. That is where Nomi, Kindroid, Character.AI, CHAI, and the monthly version of Candy AI cluster. That band is basically the industry saying, “This is what one meaningful AI subscription costs now.”

Second, memory is what turns “cheap” into “expensive.” Kindroid is the best proof of that. The entry tier is fair. The moment you want more context and heavier memory, you move into enthusiast pricing. That is not unique to Kindroid, but it is easier to see there because the company actually publishes the math.

Third, Replika is still the least cleanly priced companion app in the top tier. The help center says pricing is shown in the app, and the app store shows multiple overlapping prices. That means the brand you probably recognize best is also the one you have to inspect most carefully before subscribing.

Fourth, annual plans are not always the smart move. This market changes too fast. A product can be your favorite in January and feel dated or newly restricted by April. Unless you have already tested memory, image quality, voice, and cancellation flow hard enough to trust the app, monthly is safer.

That is the core pricing lesson for 2026: buy a month, test hard, then decide. Do not buy a yearly romantic AI subscription because the landing page made the annual discount look clever.

Safety Problems Most AI Girlfriend Reviews Gloss Over

This is where a lot of list posts fall apart. They compare features, maybe mention price, and then act like “safety” is just a short warning about not sharing your credit card. That is not enough for companion AI.

Age gates are all over the place

Nomi’s terms say the service is for adults 18 and older. Replika says the app is for users 18 and older. Candy AI is adults only. Character.AI is the odd one out because its Safety Center still says users can be 13+, or 16+ in Europe, while its adult experience now depends on age assurance and age verification (Nomi terms; Replika age policy; Candy AI guidelines; Character Safety Center). If you are a parent, or if you simply want clear adult-only boundaries, that difference matters.

Privacy policies are not interchangeable

Nomi says it does not sell or rent personal information. Kindroid says chats are private, encrypted, and data is not sold. Replika’s App Store privacy labels show tracking and linked data categories. CHAI’s privacy labels and Google Play data safety disclosures show a broader data picture. Candy AI’s privacy notice explicitly discusses prompt and output handling, human review for flagged content, and retention windows after account closure (Nomi privacy; Kindroid FAQ; Replika App Store privacy labels; CHAI App Store privacy labels; Candy AI privacy notice). Do not treat “private” as a mood word. Read the policy or at least the store label.

Emotional dependency is not theoretical

Replika has one of the most responsible pieces of language here: it explicitly says the bot is not sentient and not a licensed mental health professional (Replika sentience article). That warning should apply mentally to every product in this category. Companion AI can be comforting, useful, funny, and even emotionally meaningful. It is still not a therapist, not a spouse, and not a reliable crisis tool.

Adult-first does not always mean safer or freer

Some readers assume the less filtered app is automatically the better adult choice. Not necessarily. A lightly moderated adult-first product can still have weaker privacy practices, heavier upsells, less consistent memory, or worse account controls. Freedom in output is only one part of safety. The other part is whether you can understand what the platform is doing with your data and your money.

Fake unlock tools and unofficial builds are still a bad idea

Replika’s help center flatly warns that unofficial mods or extensions can contain spyware or viruses (official warning). That warning applies well beyond Replika. If some Telegram group or random forum claims it can give you a free uncensored girlfriend AI through a patched app, assume the risk is worse than the savings.

The practical rule is boring and correct: use the official app, read the subscription screen carefully, keep your personal details out of roleplay, and do not confuse a good emotional simulation with a trustworthy life tool.

How to Test an AI Girlfriend Chatbot Before You Pay for a Year

This is the most useful thing you can do in this market. Do not judge the app by the first ten minutes. Use a repeatable test.

1. Start with one companion, not five. A single bot makes memory and continuity easier to judge.
2. Feed it three small personal facts. Use details that are easy to forget: a coffee order, a sibling’s name, a running joke.
3. Come back the next day and do not repeat those facts. See what the bot carries forward naturally.
4. Test voice before paying. If the voice breaks the illusion, image features will not save the app.
5. Request three related selfies or images. If the face and vibe drift too hard, the “AI girlfriend pics” promise is mostly decoration.
6. Check the cancellation path before you subscribe. Reputable apps make billing management easy to find.
7. Read the privacy label or privacy policy before your second serious chat. If you hate what the policy says, leave early.

This test will tell you more than any influencer coupon code. A good romantic AI should feel more coherent on day two than on day one. If the app already feels repetitive, forgetful, or overly upsold during the free stage, the paid stage will not fix the core fit.

If you are the kind of reader who ends up turning product experiments into actual client work, content, or automation setups, you can also 加入我们的联盟计划 instead of treating every AI test as a dead end. That only makes sense once you know which category you are actually good at explaining.

What AI Chat Girlfriend Apps Still Do Badly in 2026

Even the best tools in this category still miss in predictable ways.

They still bluff facts. Character.AI’s own help center says Characters make things up. Replika says it may generate realistic-sounding but untrue responses. That is normal language-model behavior, not a special bug (Character.AI FAQ; Replika sentience article).

Image continuity still breaks. Some apps sell “selfies” or “pics” in a way that sounds more relational than it really is. The test is simple: ask for the same companion in three different contexts. If the identity drifts, the image system is not really companion-grade.

Voice can still feel uncanny. Good voice makes a companion feel present. Bad voice makes even strong text feel fake. That is why I put more weight on voice quality than on gimmicky avatar animation.

Adult boundaries are still inconsistent. Some tools will flirt freely but stop short of explicit content. Some sell themselves with adult vibes and then hit moderation walls. Others are permissive but feel low-trust in every other way. That tension is not going away because app stores, payment processors, and safety teams all pull in different directions.

They are still poor substitutes for real support in serious situations. Replika says this out loud, and more brands should. If you are in crisis, lonely to the point of functional collapse, or replacing human help entirely, a companion bot is the wrong primary tool.

That does not mean these apps are bad. It means you should buy them for what they actually do well: company, novelty, experimentation, roleplay, emotional texture, and low-friction conversation. Buy them for that, and you are less likely to be disappointed.

When You Do Not Need a Romantic AI at All

A surprising number of readers land here wanting an AI chat girlfriend and then realize their real problem is much less romantic.

Some want a general AI they can talk to for free at night and use for writing or coding during the day. Some want a customer-service bot for Facebook Messenger. Some want an Instagram DM assistant. Some want lead capture on a website. Those are all different purchases from an 人工智能女友聊天机器人.

If your actual goal is business messaging, the right move is not buying a companion app and trying to bend it into customer support. The right move is using a real messaging automation stack. That is where MessengerBot makes more sense: Facebook Messenger, Instagram, website chat, forms, flows, broadcasts, and follow-up logic instead of synthetic companionship. If your test flows are already outgrowing hobby-level automation, it is time to Upgrade to MessengerBot Pro.

That split is worth being honest about because it saves money. A romantic chatbot subscription and a production chatbot subscription solve different jobs. One sells emotional simulation. The other sells response speed, lead capture, and operational leverage.

Official Sources Used for This Review

• Nomi official site for free-start claim, privacy positioning, and feature overview.
• Nomi App Store listing for current iOS pricing and age rating.
• Nomi privacy policy 和 服务条款 for data handling and age rules.
• Kindroid landing page, Kindroid subscriptions page， 和 moderation guidelines for pricing, free-tier details, and safety boundaries.
• Replika App Store listing, Google Play 列表, and Replika help-center articles on 订阅, free use, 免费试用, sentience， 和 mods.
• Character.AI c.ai+ pricing, App Store 列表, Google Play 列表, community guidelines， 和 Safety Center.
• CHAI App Store listing, Google Play 列表， 和 Google Play data safety page.
• Candy AI subscriptions, privacy notice， 和 community guidelines.